File Wrapper Search

Prosecution (US applications only)

Searches across US patent office-action rejections to find how examiners have handled a specific category of legal issue (such as an obviousness or eligibility rejection), or a specific term or reference.

ArgumentTypeRequiredNotes
qtextOne of: q, legal_reasoning_type_prefix, rejection_subtypeFree-text search term
legal_reasoning_type_prefixone of: 101_Alice (and its 3 variants), 102_anticipation, 103_TSM_combination, 103_KSR, 112_indefiniteness, 112_written_description, 112_lack_of_enablement, 112_means_plus_function, double_patenting_obvious, double_patenting_statutory, restriction_requirementOne of: q, legal_reasoning_type_prefix, rejection_subtypeA specific, pre-classified category of rejection
rejection_subtypetextOne of: q, legal_reasoning_type_prefix, rejection_subtypeA more specific rejection category
companytextNoRestrict to one company's applications
application_numbertextNoRestrict to one application
pd_from / pd_totext (date)NoOffice-action date bounds
doc_typeslist of: CTNF, CTFR, NOA, CTAV, CTQUNoRestrict to specific office-action document types
pending_onlytrue or false (default false)NoRestrict to applications currently awaiting a response
sortone of: relevance, date_desc, date_asc, examiner_allow_rate_asc, examiner_allow_rate_desc (default relevance)NoHow to order results
q_modeone of: tokens, phraseNoWhether to match q as separate terms or an exact phrase
include_verbatim_rejectiontrue or false (default false)NoInclude the full rejection text inline
offsetnumber (default 0)NoRow to start from, for paging
limitnumber (1–500, default 20)NoMaximum rows returned